Up next


What on earth happened? Flattening the curve

28 Views
Published on 07 Dec 2022 / In Other

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

Councilof1
Councilof1 1 year ago

Look at the pillars of the Parthenon from a distance and they appear straight. They aren't though, they're convex and bulge outward.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 1 year ago

Well... I have some experience in heights. I'm not a flat earther, let me get that clear. 12 floors, that means 30 something meters high, if you get two strings with a weight at the end, you'll get two vertical lines which are perfectly parallel. You can say 30m is not relevant, but how high do those columns you mentioned go?

   2    0
Councilof1
Councilof1 1 year ago

@The Man Inside: not thirty meter's I think, maybe more like ten or fifteen.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 1 year ago

@Councilof1: could it be a design feature or a mistake?

   1    0
Councilof1
Councilof1 1 year ago

@The Man Inside: I think they designed it that way. So the plillars of the temple, I believe it's the temple of Athena, look straight from a distance.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 1 year ago

@Councilof1: I'm not familiar with that building. One thing I'm 100% sure. The elders knew much more than we know now. Intelligence is lower and lower every day. We are probably the stupidest humans have ever been.

   2    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: I believe it was intentional, & a sign of their architectural skill, from what I remember hearing

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: I'm pretty much convinced.The ballers don't really provide any simple arguments and the FEers provide endless ones. We also have our own direct lived everyday experience, every one of us. There are some other big lies that come to mind that we were all assiduously taught to think in lockstep. When you realize 'someone' is trying so hard to obfuscate one area of truth, it gets easier to consider other possibilities.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: where I live there are many ancient monuments. The so called star forts, some have underwent "maintenance work". The original walls are perfectly straight, the walls that had work done are anything but straight. Hundreds of years later with modern technology and we can't do as good as a job as they did back then.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: I have many, many questions. One is very relevant: How can I see Venus in the night sky? Two: How the fuck can I see stars through the moon? The moon being a solid ball, I should never see through it, regardless I can all of the moon or not. I thought this was shit talk until I saw it myself.

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: I don't see why some people get so upset about the subject. I'll apply the same reason as I do the simulation argument, which is if we're in a simulation, well all the same rules still apply really. But people get so upset that it leads me to think the FErs are right

   0    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: It just makes alot of sense, every vid I watch, even 5 hour ones. Fully well explained, better than the ballers do

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: I bumped into this over a year ago. When it happened my thought was "Oh... These flat earth fuck ups". Now, I really have a hard time believing what I wad taught for decades. I have a very good long distance vision, I can see with my eyes ships I shouldn't, without a P900/P1000... How can that be explained?

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: yeah, I came around pretty easily after a vid or two. the 8 hour 'What on Earth Happened?' vid is good. Whatever doesn't sink into the pocket quite readily is good food for thought. I keep thinking as I watch such vids: "no lies detected", and I'm not that smart or invested in the argument ego wise. I'm happy to be wrong about anything if someone in good faith can prove it to me.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: People get upset because they (we) hate to be wrong. You probably don't remember this, I had a motorcycle that at the time was all the rage, and I sold it. On forums I was telling people the reality about the bike, I had one, bought new, and was selling it. People went ballistic on my for saying what they didn't want to hear. They agreeing with me would mean they were wrong too, they made a not so good decision. People don't like to admit it.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: Well, satellites... How can satellites be balloons? Satellite dishes are finely tuned, I know, I installed hundreds. A couple millimetres off and it won't work, if not touched, it will capture signal for decades. A balloon will not be stationary. FE claims that satellite dishes point to ground emitters. Not true. I installed one about ten meters off a wall roughly also 10 tall. That building would block any ground signals, yet it is working flawlessly for 3 years now. Flat earth doesn't explain this. No matter how much I scratch my head, I can't understand how would it work on FE.

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: yeah, they're bound a get a thing or two wrong

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: The moon land hoax, the imaginary space station, are easy to understand, are fake. Satellites are most likely fiction too. How to explain the signal the dishes catch, i can't explain. The explanations FE people give, are not in line with my personal experience. Even me having an open mind.

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: maybe you'll be the one to crack that nut then. Knowers are the ones that help remedy mistakes.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: I would need to have access to transmitter stations. I know how copper and fiber communications work, how those stations work. Never worked on cell towers though. Was never near a "satellite". Only know how it works on the receiving end, and I'm not that knowledgeable to crack something this big.

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: The technical side is what FE people lack. These equipments need a lot of cooling, fans and air conditioning machines are a must, otherwise the electronics fry. In space there's no air. How are "Satellites" being cooled? "Satellites" would need batteries, again, that need to be heated, cooled, AND replaced. Technically "satellites" make no sense. Balloons floating on air don't make sense either.

   1    0
TripeSwing
TripeSwing 2 months ago

@The Man Inside: solar powered rigs? but idk. have you seen the vids of satellites on balloons crashing, one taking out a van and a small building?

   1    0
The Man Inside
The Man Inside 2 months ago

@TripeSwing: Ah, yes, solar panels to charge the batteries and run the thing when facing the sun, but geostationary "Satellites" experience "night" too. Hence the batteries. Yes, I've seen the "weather balloons". Probably spy sataloons as the ones Google uses. My only question is the so called geostationary ones. Because I know those don't move at all.

   1    0
Show more

0

Up next