The Soviet Origins of Palestinian Antisemitism (Richard Kemp)

Wrong

@Sant77: Yeah - It's true.

@Sant77: Then Noah built an altar to the LORD and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. 21 The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: “Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.

@Sant77: The Burnt Offering 1 The LORD called to Moses and spoke to him from the tent of meeting. He said, 2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘When anyone among you brings an offering to the LORD, bring as your offering an animal from either the herd or the flock. 3 “ ‘If the offering is a burnt offering from the herd, you are to offer a male without defect. You must present it at the entrance to the tent of meeting so that it will be acceptable to the LORD. 4 You are to lay your hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it will be accepted on your behalf to make atonement for you. 5 You are to slaughter the young bull before the LORD, and then Aaron’s sons the priests shall bring the blood and splash it against the sides of the altar at the entrance to the tent of meeting. 6 You are to skin the burnt offering and cut it into pieces. 7 The sons of Aaron the priest are to put fire on the altar and arrange wood on the fire. 8 Then Aaron’s sons the priests shall arrange the pieces, including the head and the fat, on the wood that is burning on the altar. 9 You are to wash the internal organs and the legs with water, and the priest is to burn all of it on the altar. It is a burnt offering, a food offering, an aroma pleasing to the LORD.

@Sant77: Nuke every fucking idiot who believs the bullshit of the JEW cult members, and send the smoke up the notrils of their imaginary diety - because the burned offering will please it.

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: freestyle biblical reading won't work, nothing will without the proper wisdom of the tradition and both old testament and the new one reinforce each other, there are no words that can be extracted from any of them that can be used to condemn the hebrews as a whole (not even the “curse “during the sacrifice means that). There is always a connection between the opposition against the old testament people and the socialist options available from time to time, which results always on overthrowing the Bible and putting something else in its place. Therefore, it is useless trying to use biblical words against the Bible itself. In the Noah episode, what is said is that never again the curse would come in the form of FLOOD, if you understood “any disaster or catastrophe per se”, the Apocalypse itself would be nullified by that same promise. Then the next text describes the proceedings of sacrifice of animals and Levitico, which i remind that also prescribes a series of rules... Now, from what i see the burning of animals, being put in the same context of the holocaust suggests you are taking God for a fool, mixing two different categories: humans and animals. Obviously when you read such sacrifice rites you must also read “animals”, and you can go back to genesis in which is pretty clear that there is the assertion that the creation was made for the humans. Between humans and animals there is a hierarchy, (Adam named one by one bla bla), so if those two are radically different, the analogy is invalid since the start. There is always a transition between the justification and the denial of the event, because socialists are always in doubt what will fit best according to the occasion. At one time, the killing happened and it was justified, on the other moment it can be denied, as if killing people with a whole state machinery would be something difficult to do (it is not). At the same time, the jewish creed will be condemned as a mistake, but the strategic interests that connect the state and its position in the region will be crucial to make the support the reasonable option. And with that goes the dismantling of hoaxes spread through time. Quick conclusions: Does the Bible has any command against jews? No. Does the hoaxers believe in the Bible? No. Most of them use it just as a rethorical tool. What about the hoaxers’ view on christianity? Is it hostile, either trying to destroy or domesticate christian churches. And all of them are anti-catholic. Therefore, both christians and israelites will continue as it should be, the support goes on and There will be no nuke (except perhaps those from operation Samson if they try to destroy Israel), and backing for Israel will persist as long as the enemy's position remains clear—which is exactly why myth-breaking articles, books, and videos are produced. There are many archives that i delay due to the fact that i want to absorb first before uploading.

@Sant77: I am one of the old gods, from the time before men and at the creation of the universe.

@Sant77: I sayeth, "And YHWH God says, “Behold, the man was as one of Us, as to the knowledge of good and evil; and now, lest he send forth his hand, and has also taken from the Tree of Life, and eaten, and lived for all time.”

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: Nothing changes from what was written above, it was never said the man was one of us, what is said is that he would absorb some qualities related to the knowledge of good and evil. It is not an equal relation, it is a parallel, dealing with similarities, not equality. "I am one of the old gods, from the time before men and at the creation of the universe.", usually that's always the nex.t time after so called "secular thinking ", which is why atheists ends up being fake atheists.

@Sant77: I not only ate from the tree of life, I was the one who planted it...... Several million eternities ago. Aren't you lucky!