Up next


The IRS Wants To Shut Down MGTOW.TV

569 Views

Enjoyed this video? Join my GiveSendBro community for exclusive content at amrmetwally!
Help this creator earn amazing commission by purchasing web services from MWS with this link!
This creator accepts Video Requests for 25 USD. Click Here to request a Custom Video.
To stay intouch with this creator, follow amr and many others on our Mastodon Instance.
To have this creator read your super chat in their next live stream Click here.
Published on 12 Sep 2022 / In People & Blogs

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 years ago

You should have incorporated on Panama....no taxes for external earned income.

   1    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 years ago

I am getting back 30k from my IRS....I overplayed...since I am taxed at source.

   0    0
ShadowMonk
ShadowMonk 2 years ago

Screw the shit out of them, also I’m not surprised that they’re being Weaponized like the FBI. So as a supportive member of the OathKeepers I say.....they must hang!

   2    0
KEEPER
KEEPER 2 years ago

this is why i thought going full audio would have helped save you, but now your capacity is under, as much as i like the idea of having video, video is nice, but it's just too expensive to run this kind of site. i mean i will occasionally delete videos i upload. because i don't want to use up your server, but when you told me that you have been cloning channels, i thought oh shit, this is going to turn out very badly really fast.

again, i have loved this site and it's been a great resource to use, but unfortunately it's getting a bit too expensive even for yourself and you are losing the most out of this deal.

look at the end of the day, we men don't really need all that much, if all we had was just text and audio, we would manage. having videos is great, but if the infrastructure is too unsustainable, than you are playing the game of a losing battle, i really don't want to see you lose, but i also don't think enough people will jump onboard to support this website.

you could have deleted some clone channels to save the server some space, but you chose to purchase a more expensive server, and now you need more money in a market where everyone is losing more money, this is a bad idea to expand now.

   3    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 years ago

U right...only sound (human voice maxed out at around 8khz..that would be a voice of a child) so storage and transmission would be a complete joke...and if you want video let them pay for it.

   0    0
KEEPER
KEEPER 2 years ago

@Lucifer333: that's not a bad idea, but the audio can be as simple as mp3, but for your idea it could work in the short term , but the cloned channels are another issue. Look, this site appears to be doing well, but listen to Amr talk about the finances of this website, he's tredding water, there are also a lot of unforeseen variables that he doesn't take an account for, this expansion to the new server don't get me wrong it's great, but because it's $200 more expensive it's going to be that much more expensive for him, and he's thinking that more people are going to be willing to pay more, that is not a very good direction to be going currently as inflation has risen for other folks everything has gone up, meaning having a new server is great, but it's gotten more expensive not only because of inflation but because he needed a bigger server to handle everything. One day he's not going to be able to make the payment to the server, and I don't know how long you can not pay a server, but that would mean everything has to be shut down on the website until it gets resolved. It's like having rolling blackouts except these ones depend on whether you pay or not.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 years ago

@KEEPER: i was thinking of webrtc (audio only) supports legion of audio codecs straight from the browser....later downloadable in mp3 format...a mix of audio and still images is available, there open source stun and turn servers for webrtc....you can add still images to the mix ( tfm likes to show charts )

   0    0
KEEPER
KEEPER 1 year ago

@Lucifer333: if it's more efficient and less load heavy, I'm all for it, but I have no idea if this system is capable of that, I guess that's a question for Amr to answer.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 1 year ago

@KEEPER: amr uses old style rmtp over websocket....pre webrtc stuff

   0    0
KEEPER
KEEPER 1 year ago

@Lucifer333: alright, but the site would probably need some kind of converter, because the average person will have no idea how to convert their files to this, unless they could find a recorder that has that type of file built-in.

   0    0
KEEPER
KEEPER 1 year ago

Unless I misunderstood your comment, sorry I'm kind of retarded right now, just woke up lol.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 1 year ago

@KEEPER: ok

   0    0
Show more

0

Up next