Responsive image

Hasta la próxima


Solar Punk and Big Business

30 vistas
Publicado en 17 Aug 2026 / En Cine y Animación

How many of you feel caught in the middle—craving the peace and self-sufficiency of growing your own food and having a park-like, walkable neighborhood diner for every meal, yet still wanting easy access to the wider city for work, culture, and connection?

We know some people love the quiet isolation of the country, others embrace the hustle of expensive cities despite sky-high rent and grocery bills, and still others settle for the suburbs even with crushing housing costs and neighborhoods that feel disconnected from real community.

But who here is unsatisfied with all three options—and is ready to imagine something entirely new?

This is home.

Not the isolation of the countryside, not the crushing expense of the city, and not the soulless sprawl of the suburbs. This is the place where you decompress—after traveling for work, after vacationing abroad, after navigating a world that never slows down.

This is where your friends live. And if you're lucky enough, this is where your family grows.

But here's the truth: as human numbers rise, space becomes precious. So we're not building sprawl—we're building an incubator. A place where families can expand quickly without being buried by debt. A place where single individuals can stay for a season, use the low cost of living—$1,000 a month rent, better food, real community—to prepare for whatever comes next, whether that's staying or stepping out into the wider world.

Here, you learn your neighbor's name. You care about their kids. You share meals at the walkable diner, pick food from gardens you tend together, and rest easy knowing you're not just surviving—you're thriving, surrounded by people who actually know you.

This isn't a compromise. This is the better way. And it's waiting for anyone ready to choose it."

Our story starts with Jeff Bezos. In the not-too-distant future, after the instability of the old age, humanity found a balance. While some individuals still chose to live in cities, suburbs, country farms, cabins in the forest, lakeside retreats, beach houses, or mansions, a portion of humanity shifted toward living in tight-knit communities within biodomes. This shift reduced the strain on resources and curbed the inflation of assets and goods within the zones humanity had previously occupied.

Jeff Bezos, ever the visionary, saw an opportunity to accelerate this change. He committed $50 billion of his personal fortune to fund the entire endeavor from the ground up. The investment was allocated strategically:

· toward acquiring vast tracts of land across multiple continents—remote enough to allow for large-scale construction, yet close enough to major cities for easy access to the wider world.
· into research, design, and construction of the biodomes themselves, including cutting-edge climate control systems, renewable energy grids, water recycling plants, and vertical farming infrastructure to ensure each dome was fully self-sustaining.
· to building the internal communities—walkable pathways, community diners, parks, schools, medical clinics, and shared recreational spaces that would make each dome a true home.

With this investment, Bezos commissioned the construction of 250 biodome communities across the globe. Each biodome was designed to house 1,000 people in a self-sustaining, walkable ecosystem—complete with community gardens, parks, local diners, and shared green spaces. Residents paid just $1,000 per month to live in these thriving enclaves, a fraction of the cost of city or suburban living.

These biodomes were not permanent, self-sustaining environments, but rather a means to ease the cost of living for the nation's young and old citizens alike. They helped by offering lower rent, allowing residents to save money, and by providing readily available fruits, vegetables, and other sustenance. Additionally, they served to reduce the strain on existing infrastructure, as housing 1,000 people per structure meant keeping 1,000 individuals from paying what they considered unsustainable rent prices.

This helped society by balancing the load and growing sustainably. Individuals could save for a future in the older, hyper-capitalistic society—perhaps at a time when the balance is made perfect, and living outside no longer reduces the standard of living at all.

Mostrar más
Responsive image

Log in to comment

WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 meses hace

Hmm. How far from they city? Many will need to work unless the $1,000 a month is included with a job there that pays more. If they do a year Co-Op, where they train you to grow and later after a year let you seed another one or two for a couple of years assuming you get a job there or close enough in the major nearby city. I like it: Doable, but I have doubts.

   2    0
HennessyVenom
HennessyVenom 2 meses hace

It really depends on how big the city is, since the city center may be surrounded by sprawl. Ideally, though, people wouldn't live too far, so the commute wouldn't be a problem. You get the idea. This isn't meant to be a permanent fix—just a way to lower the cost of living and reduce strain on major cities. It has about the same return-on-investment timeline as a large stadium, just tied to capitalism. In the most ideal scenario, people would actually want this. Hopefully, it wouldn't drive up housing prices in the city itself. Say you have a city with 1.5 million people, and 100,000 of them live on the edges in these developments—would they just fill the vacancy with foreigners? I don't know. Either way, assuming growth continues, living conditions should always be great, and there'd be enough revenue to keep expanding. If one covers 20 acres to house 10 million people, that would scale to 200,000–300,000 acres. For reference, the smallest state—Rhode Island—has about 669,000 acres of land area. So do we have plenty of room? Yes—just not always where people need to work. This should only be funded by people who actually want this option, but in a way that doesn't exclude anyone who might want in later. The path could go a few ways: an individual builds one slowly, a billionaire does a lot upfront and scales exponentially, or a grassroots movement crowdfunds it. If the government does it, they'd probably end up using tax money from people who don't want it.

   1    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 meses hace

@HennessyVenom: You know what we used to say, at least whe I was active duty: "If the government gets involved, they'll just fuck it up." Sadly, it's too true. I mean look at healthcare in this country?!

   1    0
Mostrar más

0

Hasta la próxima