PAM BONDI KNOWS THESE IMAGES EXIST

First: I personally have zero control of Pam Bondi, or her boss, or her boss' boss, etc.
Second: If I am an attorney that wants to prosecute someone... I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want anyone to know that I have evidence, especially evidence that could be used to secure a guilty verdict.
As a prosecutor (again, my understanding of it) I am not to discuss active cases publicly without permission from the judge; for matters that could reasonably be matters of national security I would be even less able to acknowledge or discuss ANY thing from the cases, even if I was an eye-witness personally.
I image that any sleazebag lawyer who knows there are no legal grounds for their client to escape justice; would do anything possible to get the case to be thrown out; even if it meant having an intern 'leak' evidence and then freely share it with the world; all the better to have someone within the prosecution do it... or appear to do it.
So... a prosecutor not giving information that could undermine an active investigation; I can see; rich people/famous people/politicians/religious leaders resorting to underhanded methods to escape justice, I can see. Some random person not doing their job to spite the citizens of a nation without any apparent personal gain, without any close associations to one or more guilty parties, as someone who was never a member of the big club... less likey than greedy/powerful people scheming and trying to slander a possible threat?
Not saying that the whole thing doesn't need to be burnt to the ground... just offering another potential/rational argument as to 'why'.

Doesn't surprise me that she would deny the fact that the crime in the photo happened, when it did in fact happen!