Responsive image

Следующий


Combustion en Milieu Hypersonique II

17 Просмотры
Опубликован в 11 Feb 2026 / В Фильм и анимация

Показать больше
Responsive image

Log in to comment

Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад  

https://interestingengineering.....com/innovation/japa

Japan’s New Rocket Engine Uses Shock Waves As Propellant

The newly tested technology could be a key factor to allow deep space exploration.
By
Maia Mulko
Innovation
Sep 16, 2021 10:21 AM EST
Japan’s New Rocket Engine Uses Shock Waves As Propellant
Nagoya University/JAXA

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has successfully tested a more efficient type of rocket engine that is propelled by shock waves. It’s a type of rotating detonation engine (RDE), and in the test, it lifted a 30-foot (8-m) single-stage rocket.

The rocket launched from the Uchinoura Space Center in Kagoshima Prefecture and rose up to 146 miles (235 km) within four minutes. The flight lasted eight minutes in total. On landing, the agency retrieved a capsule from the sea containing important data about the test, including an image that shows the operation of the 500N class RDE in space:
RDE in space
Source: JAXA

This is a significant advance in the implementation of alternative propulsion systems, aiming at reducing costs and increasing the effectiveness of rocket engines. It is hoped the new engine design will be to be up to the challenge of the new space age, which could see deep space exploration.
What are rotating detonation engines?

Traditionally, rockets use chemical liquid propellants to lift off, such as hydrazine, high-test peroxide, nitric acid, liquid hydrogen, and others in different combinations.

Conventional rocket engines have a combustion chamber where stored propellants, fuel, and oxidants are burned to produce hot exhaust gases and, eventually, thrust. This uses Newton’s third law of motion, which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Combustion is a relatively slow and controlled process, which is also very well understood and mature as a technology.

On the other hand, rotating detonation engines use detonation waves to combust the fuel and oxidizer mixture. The explosions move around an annular chamber in a loop, creating gases that are ejected from one end of the ring-shaped channel to produce thrust in the opposite direction. The shockwave from the detonation then propagates – swirling and expanding at around five times the speed of sound. This in turn generates high-frequency shock and compression waves that can be used to generate more detonations in a self-sustaining pattern, aided by the addition of small amounts of fuel. As a result, this type of engine releases significantly more energy from significantly less fuel mass than combustion.

In a similar design, called a pulse detonation engine, the engine is pulsed in order to renew the mixture in the combustion chamber between each detonation wave and the next.

According to NASA, “Pulse detonation rocket engines operate by injecting propellants into long cylinders that are open on one end and closed on the other. When gas fills a cylinder, an igniter—such as a spark plug—is activated. Fuel begins to burn and rapidly transitions to a detonation or powered shock. The shock wave travels through the cylinder at 10 times the speed of sound, so combustion is completed before the gas has time to expand. The explosive pressure of the detonation pushes the exhaust out the open end of the cylinder, providing thrust to the vehicle.”

JAXA’s rocket test also included a pulse detonation engine as a second engine. It was operative for two seconds on three occasions, while the rotating detonation engine worked for six seconds in the liftoff. However, the test still served to demonstrate that both PDEs and RDEs are viable rocket technology.

Until now, PDEs have been considered inferior to RDEs because, in RDEs, the waves move cyclically around the chamber, while in PDEs, the chambers need to be purged between pulses. Although NASA, and others, continue to research the use of PDEs as rocket engines, so far their utility has been focused on use for military purposes, such as in high-speed reconnaissance aircraft. In fact, before JAXA’s test, PDEs had previously only been tested in 2008, in a modified Rutan Long-EZ aircraft built by the US Air Force Research Laboratory and Innovative Scientific Solutions Incorporated.

But now that PDEs performed so well in space along with RDEs, their applications might be revised and, perhaps, amplified.

On top of this, a team of researchers from the University of Central Florida (UCF) recently conducted the first demonstration of a third type of detonation engine, the oblique wave detonation engine (OWDE). This produces a stable continuous detonation that’s fixed in space.

It is composed of a hollow tube, divided into three sections. The first section is a mixing chamber, where a jet of hydrogen fuel, pre-mixed with air, is ignited and accelerated. In the second chamber, ultra-high-purity hydrogen fuel is added to the high-pressure air coming down the tube. The tube then tapers, accelerating the mix to Mach 5.0 before heading into the final “test section,” where the detonation takes place. In the last section, the air and fuel mixture is directed up an angled ramp. The pressure wave interactions in the chamber produced a stable, continuous explosion that stayed almost still. Theoretically, an OWDE engine could allow aircraft to travel at 17 times the speed of sound.
How can PDEs and RDEs transform space exploration?

The importance of PDEs and RDEs for future deep space exploration comes from their advantages over conventional rocket engines.

For example, RDEs are estimated to achieve a specific impulse that is 10-15% greater than conventional engines. Specific impulse is the thrust produced per unit rate of consumption of the propellant; it is usually expressed in pounds of thrust per pound of propellant used per second and is a measure of the efficiency of a rocket engine. Overall, RDEs are praised for their potential to give higher performance and greater thermal efficiency.

Because they need less fuel to function, RDEs could also be more cost-effective and potentially allow rockets to be lighter. By reducing their weight, rockets could reach higher altitudes more quickly and efficiently.

The RDE tested by JAXA produced around 500 Newtons of thrust. This is tiny compared to SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket, for example, whose 27-Merlin engines together generate more than 5 million pounds of thrust at liftoff – equivalent to around eighteen 747s. However, although the RDE is still in the early stages, JAXA engineers believe that it will eventually allow rockets to use less fuel and weight. This could be of vital importance on interplanetary missions.

RDEs are also being investigated by U.S. Navy for their ability to reduce fuel consumption. The U.S. Air Force has also built an experimental RDE that uses hydrogen and oxygen fuel to produce about 890 N of thrust.

Meanwhile, JAXA calculates that RDE-based rockets could be in practical use by around 2026.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

"Japan’s New Rocket Engine Uses Shock Waves As Propellant" well.... its uses shock waves as a combustion mechanism, the propellent is still some combustible stuff

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: It's like this you see, it's the thrust from the shock waves that do the propelling, thus the shockwaves are the propellant. This is as distinct from the combustion fuels and oxidisers, and the process and techniques, created to produce the shock waves, are in fact not the propellants in the transliterative sense, but they are in the conjunctive sense.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: To really UP the IQ and to increase the understandings.... I'd like to ONLY (mostly) communicate in LATIN with you...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin Partly because it's a new skill set and requires some research to read it and write it and understand it...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: uuh no, I dont mind German, but latin is a no go, i dont speak it

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: I have just created a video on the subject of learning it - I have wanted too for years - but no one within 10,000 miles is fluent at it.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: well you can use duolingo, i use duolingo to learn french for my CEFR A2 exam, this proves i can converse on leverl A2, wich is kindof beginnner, but i need it for my Swiss citizenship test, I also need to learn Italian , German i already know and i got exam at B2 (that is one level below "fluent native speaker")

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: i AM NOT PARTICULARLY brilliant at any language, but I can follow most of them, to one degree or another, Cyrillic (slavic russian) - written amost none - spoken - some keywords... French - a little written and spoken, Italian same, along with most nordic / dutch / fresian languages.... Welsh - a fraction.... Almost never see or hear it though... A sliver of spoken Japanese. I go mostly on key words - and can follow discussions... Or at least track on a point by point basis, one in every 10 or 20 or 40 words.... many languages - unless they are a combination of native and some european language, I have little to mostly no idea.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: there is a free tier for duolingo, i use it on the phone, but you can also use web, it is very addictive and its gamified https://www.duolingo.com

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Linx iz betta: https://www.duolingo.com/

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Yeah it's good... Fast and easy to learn.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Though I do wish I had a vary dominant Latin Master, to administer discipline every time I made a mistake.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

Not having a Stern Latin Teacher, kind of takes the fun out of going to school...

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: "Hmm using a preconjugate in the presumptive verb post tense, is an articulation of inflorrid terseness." === "Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, Whack, 50 x with the cane for you boy!"

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

well yeah they use the same principle for hypersonic missiles, fan blades dont work when the vehicle is at mach 10, because the blades must hit the air even faster

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

Mack 10? That is a little slow isn't it?

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

https://www.mgtow.tv/v/jAeKmx --------- https://www.mgtow.tv/v/fXGX3B - when they have a forced induction from 2:40 - well it's not the same as 400 Kmh - but the tone and strength of the engine goes up considerably.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: bruh v1 rockets maybe do around 450km/h spitfires barely could keep up, mach 10 is certainly not slow, any faster and you the vehicle would burn up (like meteors do when the enter the atmosphere)

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Naaa just use electrostatic high voltage shielding - it's easy - make mack 20 - no probs.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: that is sci fi bro, the electomagnetic field would have to be so strong, it would basically be an emp weapon

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Make the tip - the cathode and the tail the anode, it causes the plasma to run over the non conductive skin, and it gives it a huge speed boost.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: V1's are not rockets - they are throbometer engines.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: yeah i know v1 are not rockets,(because it oxygen from atmosphere ) i just call every thing Vx a rocket, lol, that is just me

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: I call turboprop engines high bypass ratio turbofan jet engines...... drives people insane who cannot accept being wrong. Especially the fundamentalists who's coercion doesn't work on me.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: Trolling can be fun - especially when it's factually true.

   0    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: ok, that's good, did you know the V1 ROCK...uuh i mean cruise missile costed 3000 Reichsmarks? that was a years salary of a metal worker back then (in comparison equal to the use counterpart salary). but the Germans also had a welfare state and paid vacations, so yeah, also the taxes on the 3000 was around 6% , not a bad system tbh

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson 2 месяцы тому назад

@Lucifer333: German translated from Swetlandic English, "missile" into Germanic, is "Dong" and when used in the aeronautic, it's "Long Dong", and when driven by a throbometer engine, it's called "Throbbing Long Dong" - in the pure Germanic..

   1    0
Lucifer333
Lucifer333 2 месяцы тому назад

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: ooook,..., that is some interesting epistemology there

   1    0
Показать больше

0