Up next


The Plan To Take Men's Freedom Away - MGTOW

171 Views
Published on 25 May 2024 / In People & Blogs

Sandman Contact Info & Store:
Email: SandmanMGTOW@Gmail.com
https://teespring.com/stores/sandman-store

Mystery Link: https://globalnews.ca/news/103....10975/justin-trudeau

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428
Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c
Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/
Sandman 2: https://www.youtube.com/@sandman2317
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SandmanMGTOW

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com

Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv


Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video is brought to you by a donation from James. He didn't give me a topic so I wanted to cover something that Rusty one of my long-time listeners made me aware of about six months ago with regards to many US States where both the left and the right were working to restrict Pron content to only those that gave their ID to spicey websites. The idea was to prevent children from accessing harmful and age inappropriate content. Which on the surface sounds like a great idea. But forcing men to take pictures of ourselves or our ID to fapping websites takes us on a slipperty slop that leads to the medium or long-term end of anonymous online free speech. That's where I suspect we are heading. And if you choose not to give up your ID to use the internet then you will be cut off from it entirely. Since I was recently put at the top of the Homeland Security Male Supremacy watchlist I should assume that the US government has gathered up all kinds of information about me. I should try and do a brief road trip this summer and see what happens at the border. If I didn't have internet anonymity when I started this channel I would have risked my own personal safety from wacko feminists and it would have cost me work clients. Here is a map of the US states that have already adopted this legislation forcing Pron companies to verify ID and age before letting people use them. Many have just decided it's easier to block access to certain states. Once the law passed in certain places the next day the most popular search on google in those states was for a VPN. The first line of defense is virtual private networks. Those services are hard to shut down and require that you have a credit card, which only those over 18 are legally allowed to have. That should be enough to validate someone's age but you know that eventually the government will push to eliminate all anonymity online to protect people from hate speech and other naughty words. I plan is to leave the country if that happens. You see in Canada they have a similar bill S-210 which is being proposed to incorporate a digital ID system if you want to access spicey content. You'd think that Trudeau was behind this but for once his party is against this. Probably because his party politicians are watching all kinds of crazy stuff and they don't want their own viewing habits potentially released. They probably don't want to get digitally Epsteined by a data leak revealing their fetishes to the entire world and potentially landing them in jail. Instead the threat is coming from the cuckservatives on the right like Jordan Peterson that love their wives and want to censor content like that which arguably has given men a lot of freedom from women over the last twenty or thirty years. It's quenched our cooch thirst to some extent. But if soon you're required to give a site your government issued ID, face or retina scans then how many guys will either get a vpn or get content on torrents or through some other means? I'll discuss more in a moment but first a word from today's sponsor Me The Sandman:





10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

Video Motion Graphics Credits:
Particle Wave 4K Motion Background by "Videezy.com"

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

Veillis
Veillis 21 days ago

You guys are over thinking this. I'm in UT and when they put the verification on prn here it took me all of maybe 5min to find a site that doesn't require it. There is no way to enforce these laws, they are just BS - "make you feel good" laws.

   1    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 21 days ago

True, but it's a tack on. When you get in trouble for something else, it's a death by a thousand paper cuts as they keep tacking on all this bullshit.

   1    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 22 days ago

Besides, there will just develop an economy of swapping media card or usb drives with porn on it. This is about identifying who you are nothing more, Surveillance, illegal surveillance.

   0    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 22 days ago

If they are trying to get more men to get married by taking down porn so they might get married, more men might be getting married but not here... they'll leave quicker as Passport Bros.

   2    0
eldrazi317
eldrazi317 22 days ago

I also see it as the metaphorical burning of the Library of Alexandria; Porn is only the beginning, then it’s all knowledge.

   1    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 21 days ago

@eldrazi317: Weel porn does cause you to rise to the occassion...

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

This is a criminal enterprise......

The Surveillance State.

And porn companies... most of the content is crazy shit by crazy people...

And the women in them - are all fucked in the head....

It's crazy and unhealthy.

   3    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 22 days ago

ueah, but take out the power and destroy the cameras routineslt so they are always repairing them,,, it's not foolproof as they think.

   3    0
Show more

0

Up next