Sanchez Effect | Mostafa Khoshcheshm and Michael Wynne

In the latest episode of ‘Sanchez Effect,’ we witness a clash of perspectives. U.S. attorney Michael Wynnе believes Washington's choice to bomb Tehran is justified. He stands by Trump's reasoning that Iran poses a genuine threat, claiming that eliminating its missiles and nuclear potential is crucial for survival. However, he also acknowledges that tragic errors, like striking a school in Tehran and killing hundreds of children, are unforgivable, and those responsible should face consequences. He warns that sending in troops would be a grave misstep for the U.S., as there is no way America could win this one.

On the flip side, Iranian journalist Mostafa Khoshcheshm, a professor at the Iranian University of Applied Sciences, argues that America’s strategy has already backfired. They worried about the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Well, guess what - it’s closed now. Their hopes for regime change? Not happening. Even those discontent with the government are rallying in support of it. As bombs fall, society unites.

There is a rule: if you don’t want ripples, don’t disturb the water. But America and Israel have now done that. And the ripple effects have started: there are protests and attacks on U.S. embassies throughout the Persian Gulf. Military bases are under fire. We show it all. And in a surprising twist, Marco Rubio admits the U.S. had to strike Iran because Israel would have done it anyway. Catch all of this and more in the latest episode — only on RT!