Up next

Red Pill Rage | Popp Culture

subs count
Published on 03 Jul 2020 / In Comedy

⁣When you're dating in the real world and you discover everything you've been taught is a dirty lie, you first reaction is denial. Then comes rage. After a while, you accept it. Now it's time to fight back.

Join the fight against Fourth Wave Feminism!

Sandman wants to tell you about the Brave Browser!
Download the Brave Browser today and say goodbye to corporate ads: https://brave.com/san644

"The Bro Next Door" is free for your Amazon Kindle (with Prime)!

Download "The Jericho Files, Book 1: Killer of Killers" by Popp
Free with Prime!

How can you support Popp Culture?
Go to http://www.Redonkulas.com/donate
You can contribute via Patreon, Paypal, SubscribeStar or Cryptocurrency!
Purchase your genuine Redonkulas swag on http://www.PatrolBase.net

Send physical donations to:
Redonkulas.com Productions
29488 Woodward Avenue, Unit 407
Royal Oak, MI 48072
If you write a check, make it out to Second Class Citizen, 501c3
All donations are tax deductible

Check us out on all platforms and social media!

Sources (in order of appearance):
1. https://archive.ph/RaS8t
2. https://archive.ph/zv1c4
3. https://archive.ph/jN1Uk
4. https://archive.ph/x8uIg
5. https://archive.ph/fbaoS
6. https://archive.ph/S86RF
7. https://archive.ph/8pvBU
8. https://archive.ph/OlYmD
9. https://archive.ph/Qtzq7
10. https://archive.ph/JcS03
11. https://archive.ph/Fs6ip
12. https://archive.ph/ubOe
13. https://archive.ph/oRWJ8
14. https://archive.ph/Gr4e3
15. https://archive.ph/4hOfa
16. https://archive.ph/nv4TH
17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8MFPQ9b0xg
18. https://archive.ph/m6i2D
19. https://archive.ph/rDb0h
20. https://archive.ph/q1JRz
21. https://archive.ph/WkGLf
22. https://archive.ph/RFXOw
23. https://archive.ph/BPFGp
24. https://archive.ph/5tK5H

Video Throwbacks
Simpin’ Ain’t Easy
Don’t Ride a Horse Chick

Show more
crimsonhawk 1 year ago

fuck youtube

   0    0
Madmanmikey 1 year ago

Butt at 4:27 is best butt

   1    0
Ratherbefishing 1 year ago

https://prostate.org.nz/ Organise Movember event as a fundraiser.
Ask and thou shall receive.

   0    0
wroger_wroger 1 year ago

Terry Popp - Alcoholics Anonymous Recruitment Officer.

   1    0
Manfred 1 year ago

Great video, one of the most concise descriptions of the red pill I have seen.
I will just add, to the young men seeing this, that women do not have any problem with all the evil things they do. They only exert their inner nature - they are, and alway were, dependent of men to survive. Just like any other parasite.

Is it useful for the parasites to have empathy for their host?

No! Nature has provided them with plenty of mental structures to justify to themselves their parasitic and destructive actions. And usually they find ways to claim YOU (men) are to blame.

*** It is all natural. ***

And because its instinctive and natural, itmeans that YOU DON'T HAVE EXCEPTIONS. Thus AWALT: All Women Are Like That.

Nature has also design men in ways to counterbalance this female behaviour.

Buuuuut... <Insert appropriate image>

Guess what? Society is oppressing and destroying men's nature: ence the toxic masculinity hammer and all the indoctrination to destroy masculinity. So that female nature reigns unchallenged.

Its just as if vampires make garlic bad, rare and illegal.

   4    0
MrA_H0Ie 1 year ago

21:05 The curtain under her arms is proof of a botched, life threatening, 10 second long "digital liposuction".

   0    0
MrA_H0Ie 1 year ago

After 15:12 that's incorrect by a lot.
Both "63% higher than" or "63% increase" means women get about 3 fifths of what men get, not 1 third.

NOT because 63% is roughly 3 fifths.
It's because 1 / 1.63 is around 3 fifths.

Why? Because the base, what's 100%, is either set by what comes after the word THAN or, if there is no THAN then 100% is NOT what the percentage refers to (in this case NOT MEN if it's explained like in the PDF document, page 2).
So, in this case "female average" is 100%.
This means 63% comes on top of that for men.

PDF document linked through a button on https://archive.ph/Qciao
Top of Page 2:
『 treatment as male is associated with a 63% average increase in sentence length』
explained in more detail in part of the text under Table 4 (page 25):
『 The constant line is the average in the female treatment condition and the "percent" line expresses the treatment effect as a percent of this female average』

But that description under Table 4 is unnecessary if you know the standard language with percentages:
"increase" ALWAYS starts from 100%.
So, 63% increase is 100% + 63%.
In this case 100% is the average sentence WOMEN GET.
63% increase means MEN GET 1.63 TIMES as long sentences as women do.

If you think this means women get a third of what men get, you're wrong. You made the false assumption that 100% is what men get and you subtracted 63% from that to get what you falsely assumed to be women's prison sentence length compared to men's. With that wrong assumption you get 37% for women.

This is why Popp said, women get a THIRD of men's sentence length. He made that wrong assumption that men's sentence length is the base (100%) when the opposite is true: women's sentence length is the base.

He wants to take men's average as 100% and say how much less women get.

100% times 1.00 divided by 1.63 is the percentage for women: 61.35% of the sentence length men get.
That's how you make men's 1.63 to be the new 100% and then women's 1.00 is what you get as the result: 61.35%.

So, women get about 3 fifths of what men get, not a third of what men get.
A third is nowhere in this situation, no matter how you slice it.

Think of it by rounding to simple fractions...

Short version:
If women get 3 fifths ( 60% ) of what men get then the 40% difference is 2/3 of women's 60%, so men get 2/3 = 66.667% more than women get (the reported value is 63%).

This is why it makes sense to say that "women get 3 fifths of what men get" which is the same as "men get 2 thirds more than women get" and you could also say "women get 2 fifths less than men get" or even "men get 5 thirds of what women get".
All 4 wordings refer to the same difference with various viewpoints.
In the article they chose the second wording "men get ... more than women get" and their 63% is close to 2 thirds.

Popp chose the first wording and he would have been right if the article would have used the third wording "women get ... less than men get" with 63%, but they used the 2nd, not the 3rd.
He didn't focus on this, so he used the wrong calculation 100%-63% = 37% (false) instead of 1/1.63 = 61.35% (correct).

The same as the above with a little more explanation:
Let say women get 3 fifths ( 60% ) of men's 100% average.
How much more than women do men get if the 40% difference will be compared to women's average?
We reset 100% to women's average when we divide by women's 60%.
Men get this much times more than women get:
100% / 60% = 5/3 = 1 + 2/3 = 1 + (40% / 60%) = 1.66667 = 166.667% (whichever you understand will do).
That's 2/3 more than 1, so the increase for men measured from women's 100% average would be
40% / 60% = 2/3 = 0.66667 = 66.667%

That's so close to the real 63% increase that it's fine if we say
"men get 2 thirds more than women get"
or "women get 3 fifths of what men get".

   2    0
Ratherbefishing 1 year ago

I thank the Gods daily that there are mathematicians in the world.

   1    0
Ratherbefishing 1 year ago

Thank you MrA_H0Ie for that clear and concise explanation of percentages.

   1    0
MrA_H0Ie 1 year ago

@Ratherbefishing: You just made my day :) I love to explain shit.

   0    0
smartguy 1 year ago

One of the best videos you've made. Keep going man. We need you!

   2    0
tekrat 1 year ago

women don't love they use...

   1    0
RevKev 1 year ago

I like..."a relationship today is like treating a broken leg by throwing yourself down the stairs."
There's only one place to find truth in life.
"Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I might win Christ." Philippians 3:8 KJV

   0    0

Let's be honest, if women didn't have a cuntaaaaah between their legs, there would be a bounty on their heads....just saying.

   0    0
JMV59 1 year ago

Heh. Why do women have pussies? So men will talk to them. NOTE: That used to be true, now they use it to trap men into a lifetime of slavery. Thank God for truth sayers like Popp and Hammerhand.

   0    0
Anathema 1 year ago


   4    0
doczg88 1 year ago

Feminism = Chaos
Patriarchy = Civilization

   6    0
Thompsonm 1 year ago

What happened to the halftime show.

   4    0
JLB58 1 year ago

I think it's on Alt-Tech/Bitchute now

   1    0
JMV59 1 year ago

@JLB58: I thought mgtow.tv was alt tech. I gave up on bitchute, only hang here now. But I do miss the halftime show, nothing like a bunch of cute wahmen looking for attention.

   4    0
P_M_S 1 year ago

It will be when it's ready and Alt-Tech is also mgtow.tv. Besides here's better video quality than on Bitchute.

   3    0
JLB58 1 year ago

@JMV : cheers, bud. Thanks.

   0    0
Embedded Basis
Embedded Basis 1 year ago

What women really want is to leave men confused so they can be manipulated.

   7    0
QDLLC 1 year ago

Never heard of Ferrisu Beulers Day Off.

   0    1
QDLLC 1 year ago

Same deal with endangered species...only the cute ones get the attention.

   2    0
AladinDarkness 1 year ago

I am an over 60 Whitish disabled Vet, so it wouldn't work for me, BUT...
If I were young and hire-able, I would identify as a Gay, Black Woman, GBW, to get in the top percentile of people that employers want to hire.
Guaranteed job with no chance of being fired because I'm a Minority...
Oh no he did-ant! Finger snap...

   2    0
LoudMouthTyrone 1 year ago

Men are the reward, and women would vote to destroy the reward, cause they don't want to work for it.

   4    0
john1178 1 year ago

I am 66 years old and I recognized that I was the prize starting in my 30's and 40's. Not particularly attractive just gangly. I was working and making a lot of money. Then I noticed a pattern ( over a period of times) that single women were hitting on me in their devious ways such as...can you come over and hang the ceiling fan (not a metaphor an actual fan) , My car does not work well - can you do car repairs and fix it, and or can you lend me money etc. They came very close, cooed and smelled so good and touched me on my arm, back or leg. Then it dawned on me ..NO get an electrician, NO get a car mechanic, NO- do I look like a bank.You know I would never see that cash again. My friends said I was stupid and just help them, but some how the women managed to get someone else to FIX THEIR PROBLEMS. Don't get me wrong, I will occasionally help based on the circumstances, but never lend money.

   3    0
P_M_S 1 year ago

I have a little different apporoach, just a little :) I'm never lend money to anyone man or woman and never help woman but occasionally I help man. Why? Because they don't need man, they can do everything better and they can't be wrong.

   0    0
LongRedRoad 1 year ago

perfect and get out of my head....

wait no don't!

   0    0
doczg88 1 year ago

I had more rage in the last 1 month than 5 years before. Times are accelerating.

   1    0
wayfarer 1 year ago

Good shit.
I remember reading last year (sorry can't quote who did the research) that until only a few thousands of years back human life expectancy was around 35 years and it was fully biologically justified. And they survived. If by some exception (patriarchy I guess) males lived longer there was no problem because they could still be studs, but women were not so lucky.
Until late 1950s there were some indigenous tribes in the Amazonas that would dispose of older men and women if they became a burden. At least they didn't eat them... they would just leave them in the jungle.
What's the takeaway on that?
Do not expect that life will start after 35.
Enjoy every day.

   2    0
Ratherbefishing 1 year ago

All of the Celtic races thought the Romans were absolute barbarians because they put their old and weak minded out in the forests for animals to devour and threw unwanted babies on the rubbish dump.

   0    0
JMV59 1 year ago

Damn. On target, fire for effect.

   1    0
Teddydog 1 year ago

I know you young men are listening to pop. But I guarantee you that you're not hearing what he is telling you.
No cohabitation, no long term relationship, no marriage, no children, make money.
You want a child use a surrogate mother and pay once.

   5    0
P_M_S 1 year ago

I would add this: you know the difference between surrogate mother and wife? In first case you know how much you pay upfront. In second you have chance to pay for the rest of your life.

   2    0
zarroth 1 year ago

aren't surrogates is lefty states starting to sue for visitation and garbage like that and winning? Can swear I was reading that several years back in the early 2000's. If so. surrogacy will depend on location.

   2    0
libertyanyday 1 year ago

at 19 , I was under the impression that females were just as smart, just as loyal, just as ethical, just as honest, just as ready for love .... oops!! Once you digest the red pill , its hard to even listen to them speak.........

   15    0
Show more

Up next