Responsive image

Up next


Feminists Are Now Begging For Marriage LOL - MGTOW

533 Views
Published on 08 Jul 2022 / In People & Blogs

⁣Sponsor Link: Stoic Indifference: Manual of Basic Mental Discipline
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Stoic....-Indifference-Manual

The feminist case for marriage - The liberalisation of divorce is nothing to celebrate
https://www.spectator.co.uk/ar....ticle/the-feminist-c

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ8JBTIVUVw

Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c
Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com


Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video is brought to you by a donation from Justin. He sent me an article called: "The feminist case for marriage: The liberalisation of divorce is nothing to celebrate" by Louise Perry. She points out that heterosexual marriage rates in the UK are at their lowest point on record. 200k in 2020 versus 400k in the early 1970s. On April 6th, 2022 no fault divorce was introduced in the UK. I guess there's probably going to be a spike now that you can get divorced without a good reason. I can't believe the UK waited forty or fifty years after the rest of the western world to introduce the practice. Louise sounds like a tradthot and here's part of what she has to say in her article and I quote: "The monogamous marriage model had many flaws, and the sexual revolutionaries were correct in pointing them out. But this model is also the best solution yet discovered to the problems presented by the asymmetrical investments that men and women make in the process of reproduction. For all of its trade-offs, there was wisdom in the traditional model. The father was primarily responsible for earning money; the mother for caring for children at home. Such a model allows mothers and children to be physically together and at the same time financially supported. In an age of labour saving devices like washing machines and gas boilers, it has become less time consuming to run a household, and thus more feasible for mothers of young children to do paid work outside of the home – as most of us do. But attempting to play the traditional roles of mother and father simultaneously – as single mothers are forced to – is close to impossible, particularly on low wages." Unquote. So she's figured out that a single divorced mother can't take care of a successfully family all by her lonesome. So what does she do to get men back to the table. She says that feminists were both right and wrong about marriage and then proceeds to complain that marriages are too expensive these days and that couples can't get married until they save up money for extravagant weddings. She also blames men by saying that all we care about is short-termism in our sexual behavior. That we are afraid of commitment when it comes to marriage. This woman is not begging for traditional marriage to come back. She is blaming men, the top five to ten percent of men mind you for having too much sex. How about if she blames the women those men are sleeping with for giving away sex too easily? She has and answer and here it is and I quote: "In order to change the incentive structure, we would need a technology that discourages short-termism in male sexual behaviour, protects the economic interests of mothers, and creates a stable environment for the raising of children. And we do already have such a technology, even if it is old, clunky, and prone to periodic failure. It’s called monogamous marriage." unquote. But when I hear that all I hear is that women get their economic needs met and children get a good environment. But the Gigachads lose out on sexual variety. Going back to traditional marriage is a step down for such men. Besides you can't force them to get married. You also can't force them to not go around and sleep with married women and wreck their relationships that way either. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Stoic Indifference:






10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

photo credits:

1. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-50675138/stock

2. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-410515450/stoc

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 years ago

Why should I feel guilty? I have done none of the lying, denying, or crying over laids lost or runaway pussies?! Who cares?

   2    0
Atton
Atton 2 years ago

Modern contraception of the long acting variety never fails

   2    0
AvyScottAndFlower
AvyScottAndFlower 2 years ago

Hello SM, what software are you using for those two new channels?
The punctuation is off sometimes, and enunciation still a bit monotonous/flat, but it's getting there.. Quite impressive, actually
One reason I have never made my own content was bc I see cancelling/doxxing through voice recognition is only a matter of time

I always thought using an analog modulation pedal could maybe throw off the system, at least somewhat, but I never made time to give it a go bc I still have a day job plus two business ventures going, atm
Cheers

   1    0
WindSage
WindSage 2 years ago

You also have to change the way you speak and the words you use. For example there theory that Shakespear didn't write the plays and it was someone else. Christopher something. You could make a good guess who wrote it by the style of writting and words used.

   0    0
eldrazi317
eldrazi317 2 years ago

I think she’s referring to communism — ‘where every one (woman) gets their needs met’ #ClownWorld Show XD

   2    0
eldrazi317
eldrazi317 2 years ago

Socialism is already a burden on men’s shoulders.

   3    0
eldrazi317
eldrazi317 2 years ago

After all*

   1    0
Show more

0

Up next