But...but....who will pay for what women want?

This article keeps bringing up "economic benefits of being partnered". It was obviously written by a woman for women. For men, the relationship is opposite: being single gives him economic benefits. And any economic benefit from being partnered FOR WOMEN is obviously a matter of redistributing wealth, directly or indirectly, from the man to the woman.

"Unpartnered men...are less likely to be employed. As a result, the study emphasizes the economic advantages of being married..."

What utter incompetence in logic. This demonstrates nothing but the mating advantage of being employed if you are a man. It's not that unpartnered men are less likely to be employed. It's that unemployed men are less likely to be partnered. That's the proper way to interpret the data to avoid multiplying entities. How the hell do they think this statistic shows that being married is an economic advantage FOR MEN? Are they suggesting that getting married makes men more likely to have or get a job? By what mechanism? Nagging wife? What they don't say is that men without a bunch of whining parasites at home are free to work overtime, travel and relocate, come in on days off, etc., which makes them considerably more employable and eligible for raises than those who can't do those things very often because of the demands of a family. They obviously will not talk about the sexual selection pressures involved. This is either absolute incompetence or it is intentionally contrived to mislead. This right here is exactly why you should never "follow the science". Morons and liars do "science" too.

As a man, the things you have to do to thrive are exactly the same things you have to do to be mentally and physically healthy. A woman, on the other hand, never has to do anything at all. So she doesn't. And that makes her miserable and deranged. If she is alone, she is miserable and deranged. If she is with a man, she is miserable and deranged. Both for the same reason. She can't do anything because she doesn't have to. Society doesn't require anything of her and gives her everything she needs, so she never develops the skills required to be sane, stable, and healthy. Society ignores the needs of men and expects them to provide for the society, its women in particular. So, men are required to do that which empowers them to be sane, stable, and healthy.

Gimme Gimme Gimme Gimme...
A ...Few ...Years ...Later:
"What happened? Where have all the good men gone" (CGA)?
"On The Road Again..." (Willie Nelson).

Speaking for myself, I don't buy furniture (donated the furniture I had to a nun, back in '99). I'll probably keep my vehicle until the wheels fall off. I don't need as much toilet paper. So I'm probably worthless to the globalist soyciety.