Trump Betrayed America Again For An Israeli War

Withdraw from warmongering;
"Trump is the first president to bomb Iran" considering that Iran is known for publicly funding Jihad around the world, why didn't anyone else do it?
TLDR: if you make more money prolonging the problem you don't take care the source, people die, more missiles are built and sold; this could support the original claim of pursuing peace
"Trump is the first president to bomb Nigera" I have no info on this one, cause, intent, nor active campaigns; if there is no active campaign then I would still give him credit unlike Afghanistan we appear to be out of the read instead of a ground pounding war that kills American soldiers
"Trump is the first president to bomb Venezuela" based on what I have heard; this is the closes to a regime change; unlike Iraq tough; one bombing instead of a decade of American soldiers on the ground.
"wants to control the world, wants to control the resources of the world" if it ensures or is in the best interest of the people of the US, there is no conflict in intent; the question would be the 'how' and if the 'how' is not sending countless US soldiers to their death, I don't really have an issue with it. If there was a bet of "can you be the president who buys and eats domino's pizza in the oval office" and the prize is a lithium mine, no one has to die, are you saying he shouldn't take the bet because it could result in the US controlling all the resources of the world?
TealDear "Citation Needed!"
Representing oil companies... by allowing (obligating) production from Venezuela, even if 'ownership' was recovered more supply typically means lower prices; since the oil companies already have a monopoly, 'freeing' supply means they actually loose money because they have no excuse to not 'produce' more (more supply, lower price) at least that's my understanding of the economics.
"These are the same people shaking hands with dictators all over the world" Diplomacy, without violence requires gestures of non-aggression. How would I feel about 'warmly greeting' a representative of Italy, France, Japan if this were shortly after WWII, I probably wouldn't be trilled, but those nations still exist and we did not 'turn their country to radioactive glass' because of diplomacy.
"Journalists" from known media companies are almost always intel operatives dressed in legitimacy
US is NOT a democracy; we are a republic, past residents promoting Democracy are suspicious.
Strong leaders will always be slandered and even executing (failed) suicide bombers will offend someone.
Gaza, Israel, middle east, whole can of worms and that mess has been going for more than 50 years; not a valid argument for our current administration.
... and then he digresses into being a communist complaining about wealth inequality and poverty...
"Trump is making it very hard for liberal imperialists" I don't see that as a problem.
Regarding the name change from Dept of Def to Dept of War, you mean he changed it back, to restore a name is very different to changing a name if you're trying for controversy.
"Again much more honest" and that's bad?
Any nation without borders is no nation, any nation that can not or does not enforce it's borders is no nation.
"..wants to control the world and the resources of the world, and people don't like that" let that sink in "people don't like that" which people, the family that can feed their kids, the guy working 60 hours a week to take care of his family; are they upset things might get more affordable; no. The "people don't like that" are the people who want equity (communists) instead of equality of opportunity.
An adult who's objection is first 'the mask is off, they're telling the truth' then complains 'we need a government... that believes all the things we're told they believe in'. Keeps saying "we live in the law of the jungle" no... law of the jungle is that the loud 'prey' gets eaten, fast, yet somehow is holding a conversation where they speak poorly of the government of the US, mentions Starmer and Macron "and the rest", no actual claims against them or their actions...
It hurts the brain sometimes when you see someone who (at least claims to) know the score sees corruption and only criticizes the only group they know they will not be punished for.
Footage of German SS when discussing how 'we're going backwards'
"new world order"
"Is it going to be Trump or is it going to be us?"
"Double Down News"
"one of the best and most powerful organizations in the UK and around the world"
... so an "independent journalist" group from the UK that is "one of the best and most powerful organizations in the UK and around the world" is attempting to incite violence in the US that 'us' will be in charge instead of Trump...
Not one mention of "rape" or "gang" or "rape gang" or "muslim" or "refugee" on their site; in the UK little girls are being groomed, kidnapped and raped and killed and everyone knows it but not one mention of that, just Mossad and Epstein and Trump and Starmer.

Mr.Hansen ure a buisy Beaver arent you