What is the aim of Feminism? ⁣Briffault’s law ( 36)

⁣n this video we will talk about ⁣what is the aim of Feminism Brifults law? ( 36)
⁣on Sale Female Nature psychology and behaviour that will blow you away
USD$9.00 money back gaurantee via pay pal
Email - yourlifetoday1@gmail.com
Please mention Female Psycology
From Psychology Today
⁣Briffault’s law maintains that “the female, not the male,
determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can
derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association
takes place.” Today we would say “relationship” rather than “association.”
For this bit of wisdom
we have Robert Briffault (1876-1948), an English surgeon,
anthropologist, and author, to thank. I do not present Briffault’s law
as fact, nor do I dismiss it as fiction. It is something to think about
– and Briffault gives us even more to ponder.

We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating
game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or
proposals from men. Briffault embellishes this truism by asserting
that intimate relationships between men and women result from a
calculated cost/benefit analysis by women. Will she or won’t she
acquire a net gain from any relationship with the man? This does not
necessarily mean monetary gain, although it might. Other types of gain
might be social status, sexual compatibility, anticipated future happiness, emotional security, and the male’s capacity for fatherhood. Men, put that in your pipe and smoke it.Briffault continues with these three corollaries to his law:
Even though a woman has accrued past benefits from her
relationship with a man, this is no guarantee of her continuing the
relationship with him. (Translation: What have you done for me
lately?)
If a woman promises a man to continue her relationship with him in
the future in exchange for a benefit received from him today, her
promise becomes null and void as soon as the benefit is rendered. (“I
will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.“)
A man’s promise of a future benefit has limited ability to secure a
continuing relationship with a woman, and his promise carries weight
with her only to the extent that the woman’s wait for the benefit is
short and to the extent that she trusts him to keep his promise.
In economics there exists the concept of diminishing marginal
utility: The benefit derived from a product lessens with each
successive unit consumed. Consider an all-you-can-eat buffet. If you
arrive hungry, the first plate from the buffet provides 100% utility in
satisfying your hunger. The second plate provides less utility,
although you still may be a bit hungry when you begin filling the second
plate. But by the time you’re eaten the second plate, you are no
longer hungry. If you return to the buffet for a third plate, you will
probably feel overstuffed after eating it. In terms of utility you are
now in negative territory. If we accept Briffault’s law at face value, women derive diminishing
marginal utility from their relationships with men after acquiring the
desired benefits. That Briffault – what a romantic!